Neither moralists, nor scientists: We are counterfactually reasoning animals

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):347-348 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We are neither scientists nor moralists. Our mental capacities (such as attributing intentionality) are neither akin to the scientist's exact reasoning, nor are they (Knobe's target article, sect. 2.2, last para.). They are more similar to all those simple capacities that humans and animals are equally capable of, but with enhanced sensitivity to counterfactual situations: of what could have been
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NANNMN
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
33 ( #46,802 of 51,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #36,861 of 51,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.