A Principled Standpoint: A Reply to Sandra Harding

María G. Navarro

A Principled Standpoint: A Reply to Sandra Harding

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8:17-23 (2016)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers

Abstract

Take the strong rhetoric! This expression comes to mind as we set in order the ideas and impressions prompted by Sandra Harding’s “An Organic Logic of Research: A Response to Posey and Navarro”.

Keywords

Sandra Harding Objectivity Diversity Standpoint Theories Social Epistemology

Categories

Feminist Epistemology in Epistemology

Sociology of Knowledge in Epistemology

Sociology of Science in General Philosophy of Science

(categorize this paper)

PhilPapers/Archive ID

NAVAPS

Revision history

Archival date: 2016-08-29
View upload history

References found in this work BETA

The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory.Harding, S.

Standpoint Theories: Productively Controversial.Harding, Sandra

Two Influential Theories of Ignorance and Philosophy's Interests in Ignoring Them.Harding, Sandra

The Social Function of the Empiricist Conception of Mind.Harding, Sandra G.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-08-23

Total views
263 ( #11,918 of 40,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
84 ( #5,717 of 40,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...