Thrasymachus’ Unerring Skill and the Arguments of Republic 1

Phronesis 63 (4):359-391 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In defending the view that justice is the advantage of the stronger, Thrasymachus puzzlingly claims that rulers never err and that any practitioner of a skill or expertise (τέχνη) is infallible. In what follows, Socrates offers a number of arguments directed against Thrasymachus’ views concerning the nature of skill, ruling, and justice. Commentators typically take a dim view of both Thrasymachus’ claims about skill (which are dismissed as an ungrounded and purely ad hoc response to Socrates’ initial criticisms) and Socrates’ latter arguments (which are deemed extremely weak). In this paper, I clarify Thrasymachus’ views (and those of several other ancients) concerning qua locutions and the nature of skill and ability and I reconstruct Socrates’ arguments against Thrasymachus’ views concerning skill and justice. I argue that Thrasymachus’ views are not ungrounded or ad hoc and that Socrates’ arguments are rather different (and significantly stronger) than often supposed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NAWTUS
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Freedom Within Reason.Watson, Gary & Wolf, Susan

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-08

Total downloads
499 ( #4,263 of 37,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
499 ( #475 of 37,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.