Normative Reasons as Reasons Why We Ought

Mind 128 (510):459-484 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I defend the view that a reason for someone to do something is just a reason why she ought to do it. This simple view has been thought incompatible with the existence of reasons to do things that we may refrain from doing or even ought not to do. For it is widely assumed that there are reasons why we ought to do something only if we ought to do it. I present several counterexamples to this principle and reject some ways of understanding "ought" so that the principle is compatible with my examples. I conclude with a hypothesis for when and why the principle should be expected to fail.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-04-24
Latest version: 4 (2019-05-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
2,408 ( #1,192 of 60,811 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
238 ( #2,028 of 60,811 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.