Interpreting the Probabilities in Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I examine Plantinga’s (1993, 2000, 2011) Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN). While there has been much discussion about Plantinga’s use of probabilities in the argument, I contend that insufficient attention has been paid to the question of how we are to interpret those probabilities. In this paper, I argue that views Plantinga defends elsewhere limit the range of interpretations available to him here. The upshot is that the EAAN is more limited in its applicability than Plantinga alleges.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NEEITP
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-10-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-10-13

Total views
37 ( #58,439 of 2,449,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #18,255 of 2,449,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.