Finding Written Law

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I argue that textualism is far less attractive as a theory of written law than some of its modern proponents think. For it is not usually sensible to expect the grammatical meaning of a provision to determine its appropriate legal meaning. Factors that are unrelated to grammar in the identification of law (e.g., legal theory, context) do too much of the work. **Draft -- acknowledgments welcome, but please do not cite.**
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NELFWL
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-04-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-04-11

Total views
35 ( #59,859 of 64,268 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,486 of 64,268 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.