The Separability or Inseparability of Metaphysics from Modern Science: Comte and Whitehead

In Shang Nelson & Wirnkar Siwiyni Christian (eds.), SCIENCE ET POLITIQUE Réflexions sur des fondements de la dynamique culturelle contemporaine. Paris: L’Harmattan. pp. 119 - 140 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Central to this chapter is a basic philosophical concept of the nature of modern science which exists amongst positivists, like Auguste Comte, who rejects as illegitimate all that cannot be directly observed in the investigation and study of any subject. Our daily experience of the nature of science continues to give us reasons to unlearn what can be considered as prejudices and errors in our conception of the nature of science. Consequently, the question "what is the nature of modern science?" still perplexes us, and the answers we provide to this question often reveal how distorted our vision of history and thought has become over the years. This chapter shall, via the method of critical analysis in philosophy pass through Comte's three stages of arriving at the truth. This approach rejects as non-scientific all that cannot be directly observed in the investigation and study of any subject against Whitehead's approach in which he tries to make a “dispassionate consideration of the nature of things, antecedently to any special investigation into their details”. This is a standpoint Whitehead terms “metaphysical.” This explains why he developed a comprehensive metaphysical system for the understanding of science, society, and self as found in his major texts. In this light, science cannot be done without taking metaphysics into account.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-26

Downloads
158 (#90,368)

6 months
46 (#94,350)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?