Can Genetic Enhancement be Obligatory? Four Arguments

Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (9999):95-104 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Surprisingly, some believe that it would be morally permissible to genetically un-enhance one’s offspring (perhaps to share a trait of the parents or siblings). More common is the belief that it would be morally permissible to genetically enhance one’s offspring, as the technology to do so becomes available. Parents believe that it would be good to provide their children with all of the usual opportunities to succeed in life (education, culture, sport). Why not provide them with enhanced traits of being bigger, faster, or smarter? However, would it be obligatory for us to avail ourselves and our future offspring of these techniques, as they become available? Are we wrong not to genetically engineer our kids to be bigger, faster, smarter? Mark Neunder argues for and defends the view that we are so obliged, as the new technology becomes available (as it clearly will).

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
139 (#93,750)

6 months
103 (#53,292)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?