Fairness as 'Appropriate Impartiality' and the Problem of the Self Serving Bias

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):695-709 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Garrett Cullity contends that fairness is appropriate impartiality Chapters 8 and 10 and Cullity ). Cullity deploys his account of fairness as a means of limiting the extreme moral demand to make sacrifices in order to aid others that was posed by Peter Singer in his seminal article ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. My paper is founded upon the combination of the observation that the idea that fairness consists in appropriate impartiality is very vague and the fact that psychological studies show the self-serving bias is especially likely to infect one’s judgements when the ideas involved are vague. I argue that Cullity’s solution to extreme moral demandingness is threatened by these findings. I then comment on whether some other theories of fairness are vulnerable to the same objection.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NEWFAA-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-06-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Online Shaming.Norlock, Kathryn J.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-12-02

Total views
400 ( #9,314 of 45,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #6,246 of 45,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.