Monuments as commitments: How art speaks to groups and how groups think in art

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (4):971-994 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Art can be addressed, not just to individuals, but to groups. Art can even be part of how groups think to themselves – how they keep a grip on their values over time. I focus on monuments as a case study. Monuments, I claim, can function as a commitment to a group value, for the sake of long-term action guidance. Art can function here where charters and mission statements cannot, precisely because of art’s powers to capture subtlety and emotion. In particular, art can serve as the vessel for group emotions, by making emotional content sufficiently public so as to be the object of a group commitment. Art enables groups to guide themselves with values too subtle to be codified.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NGUMAC
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-05-15
Latest version: 2 (2019-07-02)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-05-15

Total views
508 ( #8,152 of 51,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
194 ( #2,010 of 51,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.