Trust in Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Discretionary Account

Ethics and Information Technology 24 (1):1-10 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper sets out an account of trust in AI as a relationship between clinicians, AI applications, and AI practitioners in which AI is given discretionary authority over medical questions by clinicians. Compared to other accounts in recent literature, this account more adequately explains the normative commitments created by practitioners when inviting clinicians’ trust in AI. To avoid committing to an account of trust in AI applications themselves, I sketch a reductive view on which discretionary authority is exercised by AI practitioners through the vehicle of an AI application. I conclude with four critical questions based on the discretionary account to determine if trust in particular AI applications is sound, and a brief discussion of the possibility that the main roles of the physician could be replaced by AI.

Author's Profile

Philip J. Nickel
Eindhoven University of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-31

Downloads
386 (#41,824)

6 months
125 (#26,114)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?