Naming and epistemic necessity

Noûs 55 (2):334-362 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kripke (1980) hypothesizes a link between rigidity and scope: a singular term is rigid over a space S of possibilities just in case it is scopeless with respect to modals that quantify over S. Kripke’s hypothesis works well when we consider the interaction of singular terms with metaphysical modals, but runs into trouble when we consider the interaction of singular terms with epistemic modals. After describing the trouble in detail, and considering one non-solution to it, I develop a novel version of dynamic semantics that resolves the problem.

Author's Profile

Dilip Ninan
Tufts University

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-29

Downloads
274 (#55,692)

6 months
98 (#38,143)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?