Chance and Necessity

Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):294-308 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A principle endorsed by many theories of objective chance, and practically forced on us by the standard interpretation of the Kolmogorov semantics for chance, is the principle that when a proposition P has a chance, any proposition Q that is necessarily equivalent to P will have the same chance as P. Call this principle SUB (for the substitution of necessary equivalents into chance ascriptions). I will present some problems for a theory of chance, and will argue that the best way to resolve these problems is to reject SUB, and similar principles e.g. for the chances of outcomes or the chances of events. Objective chance, it turns out, carves things more finely than necessary equivalence does.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Emergent Chance.List, Christian & Pivato, Marcus

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
154 ( #16,015 of 37,118 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #20,808 of 37,118 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.