Causal Counterfactuals and Impossible Worlds

In Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock & Huw Price (eds.), Making a Difference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 14-32 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A standing challenge in the theory of counterfactuals is to solve the “deviation problem”.  Consider ordinary counterfactuals involving an antecedent concerning a difference from the actual course of events at a particular time, and a consequent concerning, at least in part, what happens at a later time.  In the possible worlds framework, the problem is often put in terms of which are the relevant antecedent worlds. Desiderata for the solution include that the relevant antecedent worlds be governed by the actual laws of nature with no miracles; that the past in those worlds before the antecedent time matches the actual past; that the account is compatible with determinism, and that many of our ordinary counterfactual judgments are correct, and would be correct even given determinism. Many theorists have compromised on one or more of these desiderata, but this paper presents an account employing impossible worlds that satisfies them all.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-12-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causation: A User’s Guide.Paul, L. A. & Hall, Ned
A Theory of Conditionals.Stalnaker, Robert

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Impossible Worlds.Berto, Franz & Jago, Mark

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
590 ( #5,917 of 47,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
106 ( #5,434 of 47,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.