The extent of metaphysical necessity

Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):313-339 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A lot of philosophers engage in debates about what claims are “metaphysically necessary”, and a lot more assume with little argument that some classes of claims have the status of “metaphysical necessity”. I think we can usefully replace questions about metaphysical necessity with five other questions which each capture some of what people may have had in mind when talking about metaphysical necessity. This paper explains these five other questions, and then discusses the question “how much of metaphysics is metaphysically necessary?”, and each of its five replacements

Author's Profile

Daniel Nolan
University of Notre Dame


Added to PP

1,073 (#11,734)

6 months
261 (#8,991)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?