The Irrational Game: why there’s no perfect system

In Eric Bronson (ed.), Poker and Philosophy. Open Court. pp. 105-115 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a chapter written for a popular audience, in which I use poker as a convenient illustration of probability, determinism and counterfactuals. More originally, I also discuss the roles of rationality versus psychological hunches, and explain why even in principle game theory cannot provide us the panacea of a perfect winning srategy. (N.B. The document I have uploaded here is slightly longer than the abbreviated version that appears in the book, and also differs in a few other minor details.)

Author's Profile

Robert Northcott
Birkbeck College, London

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-13

Downloads
399 (#42,719)

6 months
94 (#46,599)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?