Dichotomies and Artifacts: A Reply to Professor Hookway

In Rivas Monroy , Cancela Silva & Martínez Vidal (eds.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. pp. 71-80 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this reply to Professor Hookway’s lecture the comments are focused, first, on the topic of what dichotomies really are, since it is an illuminating way of understanding pragmatism in general and Putnam’s pragmatism in particular. Dichotomies are artifacts that we devise with some useful purpose in mind, but when inflated into absolute dichotomies they become metaphysical bogeys as it is illustrated by the twentieth century distinction between fact and value. Secondly, a brief comment on the so-called “thick” ethical concepts and artifact terms is presented, and finally it is added a word on John L. Austin, whose approach to dichotomies is aligned with pragmatism and Putnam.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
How to Do Things with Words.Austin, John Langshaw
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
377 ( #11,375 of 49,074 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #14,986 of 49,074 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.