Dichotomies and Artifacts: A Reply to Professor Hookway

In Rivas Monroy , Cancela Silva & Martínez Vidal (eds.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. pp. 71-80 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this reply to Professor Hookway’s lecture the comments are focused, first, on the topic of what dichotomies really are, since it is an illuminating way of understanding pragmatism in general and Putnam’s pragmatism in particular. Dichotomies are artifacts that we devise with some useful purpose in mind, but when inflated into absolute dichotomies they become metaphysical bogeys as it is illustrated by the twentieth century distinction between fact and value. Secondly, a brief comment on the so-called “thick” ethical concepts and artifact terms is presented, and finally it is added a word on John L. Austin, whose approach to dichotomies is aligned with pragmatism and Putnam.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NUBDAA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig
Words and Life.Putnam, Hilary

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-09-08

Total views
261 ( #11,252 of 39,663 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #13,220 of 39,663 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.