A Civic Republican Analysis of Mental Capacity Law

Legal Studies 1 (38):147-163 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article draws upon the civic republican tradition to offer new conceptual resources for the normative assessment of mental capacity law. The republican conception of liberty as non-domination is used to identify ways in which such laws generate arbitrary power that can underpin relationships of servility and insecurity. It also shows how non-domination provides a basis for critiquing legal tests of decision-making that rely upon ‘diagnostic’ rather than ‘functional’ criteria. In response, two main civic republican strategies are recommended for securing freedom in the context of the legal regulation of psychological disability: self-authorisation techniques and participatory shaping of power. The result is a series of proposals for the reform of decisional capacity law, including a transition towards purely functional assessment of decisional capacity, surer legal footing for advanced care planning, and greater control over the design and administration of decision-making capacity laws by those with psychological disabilities.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Competence to Make Treatment Decisions in Anorexia Nervosa: Thinking Processes and Values.Tan, Jacinta Oa; Hope, Tony; Stewart, Anne & Fitzpatrick, Raymond

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
111 ( #31,454 of 50,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #24,650 of 50,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.