The only thing I want is for people to stop seeing me naked: Consent, contracts, and sexual media

Hypatia (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In pornography, standard modelling contracts often require a performer to surrender rights over their public image and sexual media in perpetuity and across mediums. Under these contracts, performers are unable to determine who accesses, for what duration, and under what conditions, their sexual media. As a result, pornography has been described by some performers as a “life sentence” - a phrase which, if true, violates some strong intuitions we share about the importance of autonomy in sexual activity. Using the framework of “affirmative consent,” I argue that these contracts violate performer’s rights to sexual autonomy, and ought therefore to be considered objectionable. Overall, I argue that the legal regimes we create have a strong impact on people’s lives, and more important than legislating individual outcomes, the type of infrastructure we build around people’s decisions has the potential to radically empower - or disempower - those engaged in sex work.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OBRTOT
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-09-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-09-22

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.