Agency and Reasons in Epistemology

Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ever since John Locke, philosophers have discussed the possibility of a normative epistemology: are there epistemic obligations binding the cognitive economy of belief and disbelief? Locke's influential answer was evidentialist: we have an epistemic obligation to believe in accordance with our evidence. In this dissertation, I place the contemporary literature on agency and reasons at the service of some such normative epistemology. I discuss the semantics of obligations, the connection between obligations and reasons to believe, the implausibility of Lockean evidentialism, and some of the alleged connections between agency and justification.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OLIAAR
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-26

Total views
92 ( #22,581 of 37,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #20,113 of 37,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.