Brain Death as the End of a Human Organism as a Self-Moving Whole

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The biophilosophic justification for the idea that “brain death” (or total brain failure) is death needs to support two claims: (1) that what dies in human death is a human organism, not merely a psychological entity distinct from it; (2) that total brain failure signifies the end of the human organism as a whole. Defenders of brain death typically assume without argument the first claim is true and argue for the second by defending the “integrative unity” rationale. Yet the integrative unity rationale has fallen on hard times. In this paper, I give reasons for why we should think of ourselves as organisms, and why the “fundamental work” rationale put forward by the 2008 President’s Council is better than the integrative unity rationale despite persistent objections to it.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OMEBDA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-09-21
Latest version: 2 (2020-08-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-09-21

Total views
97 ( #34,376 of 51,728 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #26,952 of 51,728 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.