Wang Yangming on ‘Unquestioning Obedience’ and Epistemic Superiority

Philosophy East and West (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Within various contexts, such as politics and parenting, Confucianism has been criticized on the basis that it endorses ‘unquestioning obedience’ to authorities. In recent years, several philosophers have argued against this view by appealing to textual evidence from Classical Confucian philosophers. In this essay, I examine Wang Yangming’s views on this subject, arguing that Wang teaches that criticism of those who stand in a socially superior role relation is not only permitted, but encouraged. From this, I consider the implications that Wang’s analysis has for contemporary discussions of disagreement between epistemic superiors and inferiors and epistemic peerhood. I will argue that Wang’s position is much closer to the total evidence view than the preemptive view. Relatedly, I will suggest that Wang provides a novel proposal about how to recognise or disregard epistemic ‘superiors’, especially in the context of moral knowledge.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-06-06
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #66,504 of 71,242 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #21,380 of 71,242 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.