Craig, Mackie, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument

Religious Studies 27 (2):189 - 197 (1991)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In ‘Professor Mackie and the Kalam Cosmological Argument’ , 367–75), Professor William Lane Craig undertakes to demonstrate that J. L. Mackie's analysis of the kalam cosmological argument in The Miracle of Theism is ‘superficial’, and that Mackie ‘has failed to provide any compelling or even intuitively appealing objection against the argument’ . I disagree with Craig's judgement; for it seems to me that the considerations which Mackie advances do serve to refute the kalam cosmological argument. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to reply to Craig's criticisms on Mackie's behalf
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-13
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
243 ( #21,612 of 56,084 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #46,681 of 56,084 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.