Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument

Philo 10 (1):72-84 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In “On Oppy’s Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument,” Philo 8, 2, 2005, 123–30, Robert Maydole argues that his modal perfection argument—set out in his “The Modal Perfection Argument for a Supreme Being,” Philo 6, 2, 2003, 299–313—“remains arguably sound” in the face of the criticisms that I made of this argument in my “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” Philo 7, 2, 2004, 203–11. I reply that Maydole is wrong: his argument is fatally flawed, and his attempts to avoid the criticisms that I have made of his argument are to no avail.
Categories
ISBN(s)
1098-3570
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPMMP-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-09-21

Total views
187 ( #26,622 of 56,086 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #50,918 of 56,086 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.