More Than a Flesh Wound

Ars Disputandi 2 (1):214-224 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In ‘The Kalam Cosmological Argument Neither Bloodied nor Bowed’ , David Oderberg provides four main criticisms of the line of argument which I developed in ‘Time, Successive Addition, and Kalam Cosmological Arguments’ . I argue here that none of these lines of criticism succeeds. Further I re-emphasise the point that those who maintain that the temporal series of past events is formed by ‘successive addition’ are indeed thereby committed to a highly contentious strict finitist metaphysics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
591 ( #8,068 of 56,867 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #42,626 of 56,867 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.