On ‘a new cosmological argument’

Religious Studies 36 (3):345-353 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Richard Gale and Alexander Pruss contend that their ‘new cosmological argument’ is an improvement over familiar cosmological arguments because it relies upon a weaker version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason than that used in those more familiar arguments. However, I note that their ‘weaker’ version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason entails the ‘stronger’ version of that principle which is used in more familiar arguments, so that the alleged advantage of their proof turns out to be illusory. Moreover, I contend that, even if their argument did rely on a weaker version of the Principle of Sufficient reason, nontheists would still be perfectly within their rights to refuse to accept the conclusion of the argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-03
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
518 ( #9,350 of 55,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #6,889 of 55,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.