O'Connor's Cosmological Argument

Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Vol. 3 3 (1):166 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter is a critical discussion of the third chapter of Tim O'Connor's *Theism and Ultimate Explanation*. In this chapter, O'Connor advances the 'existence stage' of his cosmological argument from contingency. I argue that naturalists have good reason to think that on each of the live hypotheses -- infinite regress, brute contingency, brute necessity -- naturalism is preferable to theism.

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-16

Downloads
805 (#16,778)

6 months
109 (#32,354)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?