O'Connor's Cosmological Argument
Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Vol. 3 3 (1):166 (2011)
Abstract
This chapter is a critical discussion of the third chapter of Tim O ' Connor ' s * Theism and Ultimate Explanation *. In this chapter, O ' Connor advances the & quot ; existence stage & quot ; of his cosmological argument from contingency. I argue that naturalists have good reason to think that on each of the live hypotheses -- infinite regress, brute contingency, brute necessity -- naturalism is preferable to theism.
Keywords
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPOCA
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-16
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-12-16
Total views
356 ( #15,976 of 58,438 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #12,353 of 58,438 )
2013-12-16
Total views
356 ( #15,976 of 58,438 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #12,353 of 58,438 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.