Perfection, near-perfection, maximality, and Anselmian Theism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Anselmian theists claim (a) that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived; and (b) that it is knowable on purely—solely, entirely—a priori grounds that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived. In this paper, I argue that Anselmian Theism gains traction by conflating different interpretations of the key description ‘being than which no greater can be conceived’. In particular, I insist that it is very important to distinguish between ideal excellence and maximal possible excellence. At the end of my paper, I illustrate the importance of this distinction by applying my discussion to the recent defence of Anselmian Theism in Nagasawa (Philos Q 58:577–591, 2008).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
398 ( #17,365 of 65,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #31,899 of 65,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.