Weak agnosticism defended
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (3):147 - 167 (1994)
Abstract
Agnosticism has had some bad press in recent years. Nonetheless, I hope to show that agnosticism can be so formulated that it is no less philosophically respectable than theism and atheism. This is not a mere philosophical exercise; for, as it happens, the formulated position is--I think--the one to which I subscribe. I include a qualification here since it may be that the position to which I subscribe is better characterised as fallibilist atheism--but more of that anon
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPWAD
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-13
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
258 ( #28,591 of 69,193 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #35,094 of 69,193 )
2009-01-28
Total views
258 ( #28,591 of 69,193 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #35,094 of 69,193 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.