Weak agnosticism defended

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Agnosticism has had some bad press in recent years. Nonetheless, I hope to show that agnosticism can be so formulated that it is no less philosophically respectable than theism and atheism. This is not a mere philosophical exercise; for, as it happens, the formulated position is--I think--the one to which I subscribe. I include a qualification here since it may be that the position to which I subscribe is better characterised as fallibilist atheism--but more of that anon
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-13
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
258 ( #28,591 of 69,193 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #35,094 of 69,193 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.