Weak agnosticism defended

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Agnosticism has had some bad press in recent years. Nonetheless, I hope to show that agnosticism can be so formulated that it is no less philosophically respectable than theism and atheism. This is not a mere philosophical exercise; for, as it happens, the formulated position is--I think--the one to which I subscribe. I include a qualification here since it may be that the position to which I subscribe is better characterised as fallibilist atheism--but more of that anon
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPWAD
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
195 ( #25,737 of 55,867 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #50,539 of 55,867 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.