In Defence of Public Ownership: A Reply to Frye

Political Theory 48 (5):581-587 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Harrison Frye claims that socialist republicanism may be unable to reduce domination due to efficiency costs and accountability deficits imposed by public ownership. I argue that the empirical and theoretical grounds for expecting such a decline in economic efficiency are weak. Moreover, the egalitarian distributive effects of public ownership are likely to be more important for insulating people from domination. So too, workers, consumers, and citizens are not well-protected from domination by the accountability of managers to profit-seeking shareholders. I conclude that the investor-owned firm will do far more to exacerbate dominating power than to constrain it.

Author's Profile

Tom O'Shea
University of Edinburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-27

Downloads
378 (#22,490)

6 months
74 (#10,169)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?