A Puzzle About the Agnostic Response to Peer Disagreement

Philosophia 41 (4):1253-1261 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper argues that the view to the effect that one should suspend judgment in the face of a disagreement with a recognised epistemic peer results in a puzzle when applied to disagreements in which one party is agnostic. The puzzle is this: either the agnostic party retains her suspension of judgment, or she suspends it. The former option is discarded by proponents of the agnostic response; the latter leads the agnostic response to undermine itself
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-22
View other versions
Added to PP

115 (#50,462)

6 months
9 (#62,710)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?