A Puzzle About the Agnostic Response to Peer Disagreement

Philosophia 41 (4):1253-1261 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper argues that the view to the effect that one should suspend judgment in the face of a disagreement with a recognised epistemic peer results in a puzzle when applied to disagreements in which one party is agnostic. The puzzle is this: either the agnostic party retains her suspension of judgment, or she suspends it. The former option is discarded by proponents of the agnostic response; the latter leads the agnostic response to undermine itself
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PALAPA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-22
View other versions
Added to PP
2013-05-14

Downloads
115 (#50,462)

6 months
9 (#62,710)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?