Kant’s Quasi-Transcendental Argument for a Necessary and Universal Evil Propensity in Human Nature

Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):261-297 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In Part One of Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, Kant repeatedly refers to a “proof ” that human nature has a necessary and universal “evil propensity,” but he provides only obscure hints at its location. Interpreters have failed to identify such an argument in Part One. After examining relevant passages, summarizing recent attempts to reconstruct the argument, and explaining why these do not meet Kant’s stated needs, I argue that the elusive proof must have atranscendental form (called quasi-transcendental because Kant never uses “transcendental” in Religion). With deceptive simplicity, the section titles of Part One, viewed as components in an architechtonic system of religion, constitute steps in just such a proof
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Kant's Theory of Freedom.Allison, Henry E.
S.Kant, Immanuel

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
454 ( #9,242 of 50,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #13,546 of 50,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.