Three Perspectives on Abraham’s Defense Against Kant’s Charge of Immoral Conduct

Journal of Religion 89 (4):467–497 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Throughout history no mere mortal has been more revered and esteemed by so many diverse people than Abraham, great patriarch of the three enduring monotheistic religions. Yet Judaism, Christianity and Islam all agree that this man attempted to kill his own, innocent son, an act so dastardly that it would normally be judged both immoral and illegal in any civil society. Surprisingly, the scriptures of these three religious faiths praise Abraham for this very act, justifying it in very different ways, but all portraying it as the paradigm of religious obedience.

Author's Profile

Stephen R. Palmquist
Hong Kong Baptist University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-17

Downloads
658 (#22,712)

6 months
270 (#7,905)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?