Commodification, Inequality, and Kidney Markets

Social Theory and Practice 44 (1):121-143 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
People tend to be repulsed by the idea of cash markets in kidneys, but support the trading of kidneys through paired exchanges or chains. We reject anti-commodification accounts of this reaction and offer an egalitarian one. We argue that the morally significant difference between cash markets and kidney chains is that the former allow the wealthy greater access to kidneys, while the latter do not. The only problem with kidney chains is that they do not go far enough in addressing equality concerns, and we show how the introduction of cash payments by the state could remedy this.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
0037-802X  
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PANCIA-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-02-08

Total downloads
40 ( #28,796 of 35,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #12,047 of 35,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.