Approximate Truth vs. Empirical Adequacy

Epistemologia 37 (1):106-118 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Suppose that scientific realists believe that a successful theory is approximately true, and that constructive empiricists believe that it is empirically adequate. Whose belief is more likely to be false? The problem of underdetermination does not yield an answer to this question one way or the other, but the pessimistic induction does. The pessimistic induction, if correct, indicates that successful theories, both past and current, are empirically inadequate. It is arguable, however, that they are approximately true. Therefore, scientific realists overall take less epistemic risk than constructive empiricists.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PARATV
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 7 (2017-03-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-06-17

Total views
460 ( #9,294 of 51,433 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #16,003 of 51,433 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.