Philosophical responses to underdetermination in science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What attitude should we take toward a scientific theory when it competes with other scientific theories? This question elicited different answers from instrumentalists, logical positivists, constructive empiricists, scientific realists, holists, theory-ladenists, antidivisionists, falsificationists, and anarchists in the philosophy of science literature. I will summarize the diverse philosophical responses to the problem of underdetermination, and argue that there are different kinds of underdetermination, and that they should be kept apart from each other because they call for different responses.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PARPRT
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 4 (2016-01-31)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-08-22

Total views
1,003 ( #3,495 of 54,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #16,366 of 54,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.