Realism Versus Surrealism

Foundations of Science 21 (4):603-614 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Realism and surrealism claim, respectively, that a scientific theory is successful because it is true, and because the world operates as if it is true. Lyons :891–901, 2003) criticizes realism and argues that surrealism is superior to realism. I reply that Lyons’s criticisms against realism fail. I also attempt to establish the following two claims: Realism and surrealism lead to a useful prescription and a useless prescription, respectively, on how to make an unsuccessful theory successful. Realism and surrealism give the credit for the success of a theory to an appropriate factor and to an inappropriate factor, respectively. Finally, I point out that surrealism is vulnerable to my pessimistic induction :3–21, 2014a) against antirealism.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PARRVS
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-01-31
Latest version: 3 (2017-03-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-05-25

Total views
345 ( #13,237 of 51,672 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #14,798 of 51,672 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.