Set Size and the Part–Whole Principle

Review of Symbolic Logic (4):1-24 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent work has defended “Euclidean” theories of set size, in which Cantor’s Principle (two sets have equally many elements if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence between them) is abandoned in favor of the Part-Whole Principle (if A is a proper subset of B then A is smaller than B). It has also been suggested that Gödel’s argument for the unique correctness of Cantor’s Principle is inadequate. Here we see from simple examples, not that Euclidean theories of set size are wrong, but that they must be either very weak and narrow or largely arbitrary and misleading.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2013
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PARSSA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Fair Infinite Lotteries.Wenmackers, Sylvia & Horsten, Leon
Non-Archimedean Probability.Benci, Vieri; Horsten, Leon & Wenmackers, Sylvia

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Infinitesimal Probabilities.Benci, Vieri; Horsten, Leon & Wenmackers, Sylvia

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-04-20

Total views
784 ( #2,989 of 42,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
110 ( #4,216 of 42,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.