New Water in Old Buckets: Hypothetical and Counterfactual Reasoning in Mach’s Economy of Science

In Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence. Springer Verlag (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ernst Mach’s defense of relativist theories of motion in Die Mechanik involves a well-known criticism of Newton’s theory appealing to absolute space, and of Newton’s “bucket” experiment. Sympathetic readers (Norton 1995) and critics (Stein 1967, 1977) agree that there’s a tension in Mach’s view: he allows for some constructed scientific concepts, but not others, and some kinds of reasoning about unobserved phenomena, but not others. Following Banks (2003), I argue that this tension can be interpreted as a constructive one, springing from Mach’s approach to scientific reasoning. Mach’s “economy of science” allows for a principled distinction to be made, between natural and artificial hypothetical reasoning, and Mach defends a division of labor between the sciences in a 1903 paper for The Monist, “Space and Geometry from the Point of View of Physical Inquiry”. That division supports counterfactual reasoning in Mach’s system, something that’s long been denied is possible for him.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PATNWI
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-09-14

Total views
26 ( #40,937 of 43,733 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #25,040 of 43,733 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.