¿Es éticamente aceptable la propiedad intelectual de los derechos de autor?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We intend to analyze the plausibility of the two kind of ethical justifications that are most commonly used in order to defend the concept of an “intellectual property” of copyrights. Firstly, we will examine justifications of property based on natural law, like the one originally provided by John Locke. We will argue, with the help of authors like Lysander Spooner, that the same arguments that Locke uses for property in general are entirely applicable to intellectual property, although this is certainly a peculiar kind of property. Secondly, we will examine whether or not we can apply to intellectual property the same two arguments that Utilitarian authors use for justifying property in general: the “tragedy of the commons” argument and the scarcity argument. We will claim that the first one is fully pertinent here, and that the second one is not: but this is a problem of that kind of justification of property in general, and not a problem of intellectual property as such.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PAZETA-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-09-23

Total views
511 ( #8,783 of 53,592 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
141 ( #3,251 of 53,592 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.