Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology

Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (3):417-438 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Berkeley's main aim in his well-known early works was to identify and refute "the grounds of Scepticism, Atheism, and irreligion." This appears to place Berkeley within a well-established tradition of religious critics of Locke's epistemology, including, most famously, Stillingfleet. I argue that these appearances are deceiving. Berkeley is, in fact, in important respects an opponent of this tradition. According to Berkeley, Locke's earlier critics, including Stillingfleet, had misidentified the grounds of irreligion in Locke's philosophy while all the while endorsing the true grounds of irreligion themselves. Locke's epistemology is innocent; matter and abstraction are to blame.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PEABLR
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-07-07

Total views
473 ( #9,395 of 52,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #10,770 of 52,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.