Demystifying Dilation

Erkenntnis 79 (6):1305-1342 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Dilation occurs when an interval probability estimate of some event E is properly included in the interval probability estimate of E conditional on every event F of some partition, which means that one’s initial estimate of E becomes less precise no matter how an experiment turns out. Critics maintain that dilation is a pathological feature of imprecise probability models, while others have thought the problem is with Bayesian updating. However, two points are often overlooked: (1) knowing that E is stochastically independent of F (for all F in a partition of the underlying state space) is sufficient to avoid dilation, but (2) stochastic independence is not the only independence concept at play within imprecise probability models. In this paper we give a simple characterization of dilation formulated in terms of deviation from stochastic independence, propose a measure of dilation, and distinguish between proper and improper dilation. Through this we revisit the most sensational examples of dilation, which play up independence between dilator and dilatee, and find the sensationalism undermined by either fallacious reasoning with imprecise probabilities or improperly constructed imprecise probability models
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PEDDD
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Decision Theory.Thoma, Johanna
Probabilistic Opinion Pooling with Imprecise Probabilities.Stewart, Rush T. & Quintana, Ignacio Ojea

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-12

Total views
279 ( #12,842 of 43,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #23,718 of 43,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.