Collective Communicative Intentions in Context

Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What are the objects of speaker meaning? The traditional answer is: propositions. The traditional answer faces an important challenge: If propositions are the objects of speaker meaning then there must be specific propositions that speakers intend their audiences to recover. Yet, speakers typically exhibit a degree of indifference regarding how they are interpreted, and cannot rationally intend for their audiences to recover specific propositions. Therefore, propositions are not the objects of speaker meaning (Buchanan (2010), MacFarlane (2020a, 2020b), and Abreu Zavaleta (2021)). In this paper I do two things. Firstly, I outline a collective analog of this challenge that undermines the most prominent responses to the original challenge. Secondly, I provide a new solution: Typical utterances are backed by a cluster of partial communicative intentions. This response resolves both individual and collective variants of the problem and allows us to retain the traditional propositional view of speaker meaning.

Author's Profile

Andrew Peet
University of Leeds

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-22

Downloads
53 (#66,599)

6 months
53 (#17,640)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?