Analogy Reframed

American Journal of Semiotics 32 (1/4):79-126 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The evolution of arm-leg relationships presents something of a problem for embodied cognitive science. The affordances of habitual bipedalism and upright posture make our two sets of appendages and their interrelationships distinctively human, but these relations are largely neglected in evolutionary accounts of embodied cognition. Using a mixture of methods from historical linguistics, Cognitive Linguistics and linguistic anthropology to analyze data from languages around the world, this paper identifies a robust, dynamic set of part-whole relations that emerge across the human waistline between upper and lower appendage sets cross-culturally. The general pattern—identified as “arm-leg syncretism”—provides a plausible primary source for the uniquely human penchant for creative analogy, or “double-scope conceptual blending”, said to underlie the human language faculty. This account not only addresses a conspicuous gap in the literature but also enables us to better understand what it means to be human—including how we came to be unique among other species and how we are still vitally interrelated with other species. Deely blends both sides of this tension into a single phrase: “the semiotic animal”. The paper further develops this distinction by drawing attention to one of the roles upright posture played in the emergence of semiotic consciousness.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
0277-7126
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PELAR
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-02-24

Total views
47 ( #56,754 of 64,030 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #63,385 of 64,030 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.