Głos w dyskusji o naturze sporu. Contribution to the discussion on the nature of the dispute [on our knowledge of existence of God]

Diametros 4:258-269 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that Ireneusz Ziemiński doesn't justify his skepticism about knowledge of existence of God. First, he reduces a question to metaphysical one - do we have sound, valid proofs of God's existence and imposes too heavy conditions on arguments for God. Second, he doesn't show that disagreement between philosophers in that question justify his negative assessment of arguments. Third, Ziemiński omits epistemological question what is knowledge of God's existence, especially in its direct form as well as externalistic account's of knowledge of God, for example Plantinga's and Alston's.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PEPCTT
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-02-11

Total views
49 ( #45,490 of 53,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #49,844 of 53,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.