Głos w dyskusji o naturze sporu. Contribution to the discussion on the nature of the dispute [on our knowledge of existence of God]

Diametros 4:258-269 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that Ireneusz Ziemiński doesn't justify his skepticism about knowledge of existence of God. First, he reduces a question to metaphysical one - do we have sound, valid proofs of God's existence and imposes too heavy conditions on arguments for God. Second, he doesn't show that disagreement between philosophers in that question justify his negative assessment of arguments. Third, Ziemiński omits epistemological question what is knowledge of God's existence, especially in its direct form as well as externalistic account's of knowledge of God, for example Plantinga's and Alston's.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PEPCTT
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-02-11

Total views
35 ( #38,794 of 43,688 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #38,404 of 43,688 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.