Expanding Deliberation in Critical-Care Policy Design

American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):60-63 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this commentary, I suggest expanding the deliberative aspects of critical care policy development in two ways. First, critical-care policy development should expand the scope of deliberation by leaving fewer issues up to expertise or private choice. For instance. it should allow deliberation about the relevance of age, disability, social position, and psychological well-being to allocation decisions. Second, it should broaden both the set of costs considered and the set of stakeholders represented in the deliberative process. In particular, it should consider efforts to reduce the cost of end-of-life care and to redirect resources away from the provision of costly interventions, and should expand the set of individuals included in deliberation to include stakeholders outside the health-care system.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PEREDI
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-08-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-01-07

Total views
156 ( #33,920 of 60,977 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #39,511 of 60,977 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.