Hsiao on the Moral Status of Animals: Two Simple Responses

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to a common view, animals have moral status. Further, a standard defense of this view is the Argument from Consciousness: animals have moral status because they are conscious and can experience pain and it would be bad were they to experience pain. In a series of papers :277–291, 2015a, J Agric Environ Ethics 28:11270–1138, 2015b, J Agric Environ Ethics 30:37–54, 2017), Timothy Hsiao claims that animals do not have moral status and criticizes the Argument from Consciousness. This short paper defends the Argument from Consciousness by providing two simple responses to Hsiao’s criticism.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-19
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
130 ( #36,929 of 2,433,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #19,695 of 2,433,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.