Justification, Justifying, and Leite’s Localism

Acta Analytica 33 (4):505-524 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a series of papers, Adam Leite has developed a novel view of justification tied to being able to responsibly justify a belief. Leite touts his view as faithful to our ordinary practice of justifying beliefs, providing a novel response to an epistemological problem of the infinite regress, and resolving the “persistent interlocutor” problem. Though I find elements of Leite’s view of being able to justify a belief promising, I hold that there are several problems afflicting the overall picture of justification. In this paper, I argue that despite its ambitions, Leite’s view fails to solve the persistent interlocutor problem and does not avoid a vicious regress.

Author's Profile

Timothy Perrine
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-17

Downloads
402 (#39,308)

6 months
96 (#36,849)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?