Justification, Justifying, and Leite’s Localism

Acta Analytica 33 (4):505-524 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a series of papers, Adam Leite has developed a novel view of justification tied to being able to responsibly justify a belief. Leite touts his view as faithful to our ordinary practice of justifying beliefs, providing a novel response to an epistemological problem of the infinite regress, and resolving the “persistent interlocutor” problem. Though I find elements of Leite’s view of being able to justify a belief promising, I hold that there are several problems afflicting the overall picture of justification. In this paper, I argue that despite its ambitions, Leite’s view fails to solve the persistent interlocutor problem and does not avoid a vicious regress.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PERJJA
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-08-17
Latest version: 3 (2018-12-24)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Theory of Knowledge.Chisholm, Roderick M.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-08-17

Total views
98 ( #33,465 of 50,085 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #35,381 of 50,085 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.