Standing by our principles: Meaningful guidance, moral foundations, and multi-principle methodology in medical scarcity

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):46 – 48 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this short response to Kerstein and Bognar, we clarify three aspects of the complete lives system, which we propose as a system of allocating scarce medical interventions. We argue that the complete lives system provides meaningful guidance even though it does not provide an algorithm. We also defend the investment modification to the complete lives system, which prioritizes adolescents and older children over younger children; argue that sickest-first allocation remains flawed when scarcity is absolute and ongoing; and argue that Kerstein and Bognar are mistaken to base their allocation principles on differences in personhood.

Author's Profile

Govind Persad
University of Denver

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-07

Downloads
481 (#18,498)

6 months
65 (#18,726)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?