Skeptical Theism and Morriston’s Humean Argument from Evil

Sophia 58 (2):115-135 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There’s a growing sense among philosophers of religion that Humean arguments from evil are some of the most formidable arguments against theism, and skeptical theism fails to undermine those arguments because they fail to make the inferences skeptical theists criticize. In line with this trend, Wes Morriston has recently formulated a Humean argument from evil, and his chief defense of it is that skeptical theism is irrelevant to it. Here I argue that skeptical theism is relevant to Humean arguments. To do this, I reveal the common structure of skeptical theism’s critiques. Seeing the common structure reveals why some versions of skeptical theism are irrelevant to Humean arguments from evil. It also points the way forward to formulating a relevant version. By combining skeptical theism with a plausible principle concerning reasonable belief, I formulate a version of skeptical theism that undermines Morriston’s argument that is also immune from his objections.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PERSTA-7
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-05-07
Latest version: 2 (2018-08-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Stump, Eleonore (ed.)
The Case for Closure.Hawthorne, John

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-04-20

Total views
120 ( #24,174 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #13,066 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.